Jump to content

Talk:Language complexity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Duoduoduo (talk | contribs) at 19:55, 2 December 2011 (Lede needs NPOV). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconLinguistics: Applied Linguistics Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.

Lede needs NPOV

Nice article. I suggest that the lede could be made a little bit more neutral. Right now it says

...that all human languages are equally complex ... is ... an implication of Chomskian linguistics, which postulates that all human languages are underlyingly the same. However, there is no objective reason to believe this is true, and much reason to believe it is not.

I think that a Chomskian would find that last sentence to be POV. Maybe you could say there is

no empirical support for that theoretical prediction, and there is empirical evidence to the contrary.

Duoduoduo (talk) 19:55, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]