Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StreamSQL

StreamSQL

Found this on prod and I think it deserves an afd. This is surely ad copy that needs to be rewritten NPOV. Mentions in popular media: MSNBC/Forbes.com Washington Post (though trivial) eWeek [1] [2] [3] [4] database journal [5] and more on google. No vote yet. kotepho 20:59, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Full disclosure - I was the one who prodded it. Now much cleaned up but I find the notability a bit suspect.Dlyons493 Talk 21:12, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: this article is certainly ad copy. --Deville (Talk) 04:48, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Revised, NPOV, and facts added Updated article based on above feedback.(DMParent 22:02, 28 March 2006 (UTC))[reply]

This AfD is being relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that a decision may usefully be reached. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!
W.marsh 00:55, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or merge anything important to Michael Stonebraker or SQL --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:36, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't delete I think this article will sort itself out as standardization efforts progress. I killed off the marketing and added more techincal detail. Tibbetts2c 21:10, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]