Talk:Chunked transfer encoding
![]() | Computing: Software Stub‑class ![]() | |||||||||||||||
|
needs more info about how Content-Encoding (eg: gzip/deflate) is incorporated
Like - are the chunk markers also compressed? are chunks compressed themsevles, or is the entire compressed response compressed prior to chunking? 120.151.160.158 (talk) 10:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Chunked Requests
My experience shows that servers (IIS, Apache) do not accept chunked requests, even when they produce chunked response. --Javalenok (talk) 10:13, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Apache does indeed support chunked transfer requests. We are using them for file transfer streaming between backend web apps. 134.115.64.73 (talk) 09:07, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
rename this article
I would suggest renaming this article to "HTTP_Transfer_Encoding_Chunked" This would make it follow the form that the other HTTP headers articles follow. karlhiramoto (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Chunked Requests
I don't think chunked requests are possible. I've been trying to do this for a little while and according to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/338624/why-does-iis-not-support-chunked-transfer-encoding it's not possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.169.13.118 (talk) 15:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
Chunked requests ARE possible. We are using chunked transfer requests where I work to support streaming between web apps running under Apache. Maybe IIS does not support Chunked Transfer Encoding for requests, but they are certainly part of the RFC and they certainly work under Apache. 134.115.64.73 (talk) 09:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Removed "Citation needed" in the paragraph about chunked data transfer in combination with deflate compression. Compressing the whole payload results in better compressen, instead of compressing individual chunks. I then performed a test with FireFox 3.6.13 and IE 9 beta. Firefox can handle both, but IE 9 can only understand the data if the payload is compressed as a whole, not as inidiviual chunks. So I removed the "Citation needed" because it may suggest the opposite may also be possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.136.85.161 (talk) 17:08, 21 January 2011 (UTC)