Talk:GNU coding standards
![]() | Computing Unassessed | |||||||||
|
Line length
Do the GNU Coding Standards say anything about line length? – 89.8.40.93 (talk) 17:26, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Removed un-encyclopedic sentence
I removed the following, which feels subjective: it can be a good idea for most authors of free Unix programs to follow the standards — whether or not their programs are officially part of the GNU Project. Perhaps it can be reformulated on the form "XXYYZZ suggests that ...", if someone can find a good reference. --Erik 14:46, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
Rationale?
What's the rationale behind this formatting? What is it based on? Why have the mentioned decisions been made? Since it's radically different from common code formatting, there has to be a reason, right? I think article deserves a section for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.91.30.226 (talk) 07:48, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
I agree. What is the history of the style? Valcumine (talk) 02:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
Requested move
![]() | The request to rename this article to GNU coding standards has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
GNU Coding Standards → GNU coding standards –
Even the GNU uses lower case ([www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/]): "The GNU coding standards, last updated ..."
Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 03:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support per the official web page GNU coding standards and generally no reason to capitalize. Dicklyon (talk) 05:09, 16 November 2011 (UTC)