Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FOLDOP

Basically a link farm and advertising for a dictionary. Kilo-Lima|^(talk) 15:09, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question: But what about WP:WEB, Kilo-Lima? Does is pass? - the.crazy.russian (T) (C) (E) 20:08, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Overall Alexa rank for www.swif.it, the parent website where this is located, is #2,520,866. Fan1967 20:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. doesn't appear to come close to WP:WEB. Alexa rank can be deceptive - if we use that as a criteria then all manner spam sites would be listed... Bridesmill 23:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Do not delete it, please it is a stub for a better entry. FOLDOP is the philosophical version of FOLDOC (which is obviously ok), on which it was originally based. Just give enough time to the FOLDOP guys to come up with a better definition. I've already told them to write it following the FOLDOP entry. Floridi 16:52, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not pass WP:WEB. The articles of Luciano Floridi, SWIF, IACAP (same author), all the articles of Floridi^Contrib smell of self promotion. No other contributors found. MaNeMeBasat 06:43, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies, Marcello Di Bello made me realize that the entry is already available at Free On-line Dictionary of Philosophy. Shall we transform this into a signpost? PS A quick consideration: smells can be deceiving 8) cheers Floridi 16:22, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]