Talk:ATS (programming language)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Hi there, it appears that ATS often performs better than C in the The Computer Language Benchmarks Game which I think makes it quite notable to my mind. If someone is willing to take some time to help investigate this I think it might be good! Errantkid (talk) 14:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not quite sure which article to link to with regard to theorem proving. Automated theorem proving does not look correct to me. Help please? Errantkid (talk) 14:36, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I put in a link to formal verification but see also interactive theorem proving. ATS really is a pretty interesting development in this area. 207.241.239.70 (talk) 04:30, 11 December 2008 (UTC)== Notability ==[reply]

Per Google Scholar, the ICFP 05 paper is cited by 70 other papers [1], plus there are dozens of related papers and articles by the same authors and by others. This passes any reasonable Wikipedia notability test for this type of subject in my understanding. 207.241.239.70 (talk) 07:47, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]