Talk:High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Time for a Hanging
Whoever though up this way to force poor resolutions on people should be found guilty of crimes against humanity and put to death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.24.179 (talk) 22:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
HDCP 2.1
Recently HDCP added a new version. It was done silently without any press release. A quick scan showed that the real motivation is to block downstream HDCP 1.x Receiver and HDCP 2.0 Repeater from getting Type 1 content (usualy refers to Audio with SCMS copy control data) Those lead me to beleive they lost some battle that enforced them to block their own devices, and therefore avoided any press release. Can anyone shade light on what exactly happened behind the scenes, what is the use case that considered copyright infrigement, what was the resolution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkeidar (talk • contribs) 23:41, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
Removal through internal hardware bus
Anyone see that HDCP can be removed by bad security inside devices? http://sites.google.com/site/hdcontentsecurity/