Talk:Heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors

Economics Redirect‑class

	Business and economics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Mathematics Redirect‑class

	Mathematics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Statistics Redirect‑class

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics
Redirect	This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Merger proposal

Huber-White standard errors is the same thing as this, so I propose that the contents of that article be merged into here. (That article is a stub, so it should be pretty easy to do. I don't have the time to do it myself at the moment.) -- Walt Pohl (talk) 07:06, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you should just do this. If there is no additional information, juste make Huber-White page a redirect here. PDBailey (talk) 05:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NO

any article with heteroscedasticity in the title is for a select group of cognoscenti, while huber white is a common name intelligble to a much wider audience.Cinnamon colbert (talk) 12:33, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merger done, with some rewriting of lead. Main stuff transferred was some additional references. Melcombe (talk) 14:05, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So why is it called HUBER-White standard error? There's no reference on the first guy.