Jump to content

Talk:Quantum phase transition

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 147.155.96.14 (talk) at 15:20, 28 September 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconPhysics Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What does "Such quantum phase transitions can be phase transition or continuous" mean? I guess it is a typo. What should it say?

what is so "quantum" about a QPT?

I fail to see in what sense quantum effects are relevant for a QPT. Take a classical antiferromagnetic spin lattice, for example: why shouldn't there be a zero temperature phase transition when the external magnetic field is varied? There is a well-defined (possibly degenerate) classical ground state, and its energy might change in a non-analytic way under variation of the magnetic field.

Also, the statement "A classical system does not have entropy at zero temperature" also applies in the quantum case since a pure state has vanishing entropy. - Saibod 11:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if the term is appropriate, but......

Biological quantum transition

--222.64.212.180 (talk) 01:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Don't know if the topic of.....

Quantum interference can be auto-directed

--222.64.212.180 (talk) 01:48, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Info about the topic of......

Quantum invasion

--222.64.212.180 (talk) 01:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Info about the topic of ......

Quantum spirituality

--222.64.212.180 (talk) 02:11, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Info about the topic of .....

Quantum ghost and soul

--222.64.212.180 (talk) 02:14, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--222.64.212.180 (talk) 02:16, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Is it mistaken by the sign > ?

It says "For \hbar \omega > k_{B}T, quantum fluctuations will dominate the system's properties." But intuitively, if k_{B}T is smaller, then thermo-excitation can be more easily excited and thus play a role in the physical properties. So I would think that there the > sign should be replaced with < sign. But then, another question kicks in. It is later mentioned that "ω is the characteristic frequency of a quantum oscillation and inversely proportional to the correlation time.", which means small ω implies longer correlation time, and thus presumably, longer correlation length as well. Under very low or even vanishing temperature, what is the energy source to lead to such wide range collective motions, which could be infinite as the system becomes in thermodynamic limit?