Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments/CU/Keegan
Keegan
Oversight candidate pages: Courcelles • Fluffernutter • WilliamH
Comment on the candidate below or by email • Community consultation period is now closed.
Keegan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Nomination statement (250 words max.)
I would like to continue to serve the English Wikipedia as a CheckUser after the my term on the audit subcommittee expires. My work on Wikipedia always has been and always will be back-end maintenance and accountability- something that CheckUser continues to offer me. I've processed SPI cases with diligence to the substance, circumstance, and policy without issue to accept and process or decline requests. I am knowledgeable of the practice and application of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy, already serving as an OTRS administrator, English Wikipedia community elected administrator and oversighter, and one of three community selected members of the AUSC. I can be trusted to use the Checkuser tool in a knowledgeable and beneficial way to the English Wikipedia.
Standard questions for all candidates
Please describe any relevant on-Wiki experience you have for this role.
- A:
Please outline, without breaching your personal privacy, what off-Wiki experience or technical expertise you have for this role.
- A:
Do you hold advanced permissions (checkuser, oversight, bureaucrat, steward) on this or other WMF projects? If so, please list them. Also, do you have OTRS permissions? If so, to which queues?
- A:
Questions for this candidate
Being a checkuser, would you be willing to help with the Checkuser backlog at WP:ACC as there are usually up to 6 requests waiting about 5 days+? -- DQ (t) (e) 19:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- A:
Would you be proactive in looking at the open cases at SPI to see if they could use a checkuser when your term with AUSC committee? -- DQ (t) (e) 19:30, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- A:
As a CheckUser, you will likely, from time to time, coordinate and communicate with the Stewards. What cross-wiki experience can you bring that can help out not only the Stewards, but editors, administrators, and CheckUsers on other wikis? –MuZemike 21:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- A:
In your own words, what are the main differences between the WMF's CheckUser policy and the privacy policy? –MuZemike 21:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- A:
Under what circumstances do the above policies give on the release of CheckUser data? –MuZemike 21:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- A:
Give some examples on when CheckUser requests of a sensitive nature or discovered CheckUser results of interest that would not be posted on-wiki. –MuZemike 21:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- A:
In April 2011, you were appointed to ArbCom's Audit Subcommittee. What experiences do you bring from there that would be an asset for you as a full CheckUser? Note that I am not looking for specifics, but more general experiences as a result of your time on the subcommittee. –MuZemike 21:35, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- A:
Comments
- Comments may also be submitted to the Arbitration Committee privately by emailing arbcom-en-b
lists.wikimedia.org