Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments/CU/HelloAnnyong
HelloAnnyong
Oversight candidate pages: Courcelles • Fluffernutter • WilliamH
Comment on the candidate below or by email • Community consultation period is now closed.
HelloAnnyong (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Nomination statement (250 words max.)
Hey. I'm HelloAnnyong, and I'm offering my assistance to the project as a checkuser.
I've been active as an editor since early 2007, and have been an administrator since September 2010. I've been a sockpuppet investigations clerk for roughly a year now, and in that time have become one of the most active clerks. I've looked at and made judgments on hundreds of cases using both checkuser data and behavioral evidence. As such, I've got quite a bit of experience in analyzing edit patterns, working with rangeblocks and IP geolocation, and so on. I've worked with the checkusers extensively and understand what sort of information the checkuser tool can provide. Additionally I've been involved with the identification and handling of several of the larger and more prolific sockfarms.
I believe I've served my position of SPI clerk well, and will continue to do so in the future. As a checkuser I would be able to assist even further with cases, as well as help in other situations where sockpuppetry issues arise. In terms of availability, I'm around almost every day and can be contacted by email or on IRC.
Standard questions for all candidates
Please describe any relevant on-Wiki experience you have for this role.
- A:
Please outline, without breaching your personal privacy, what off-Wiki experience or technical expertise you have for this role.
- A:
Do you hold advanced permissions (checkuser, oversight, bureaucrat, steward) on this or other WMF projects? If so, please list them. Also, do you have OTRS permissions? If so, to which queues?
- A:
Questions for this candidate
Being a new checkuser, would you be willing to help with the Checkuser backlog at WP:ACC as there are usually up to 6 requests waiting about 5 days+? -- DQ (t) (e) 19:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- A:
Would you be proactive in looking at the open cases at SPI to see if they could use a checkuser? -- DQ (t) (e) 19:29, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- A:
Comments
- Comments may also be submitted to the Arbitration Committee privately by emailing arbcom-en-b
lists.wikimedia.org
- HelloAnnyong has been active and displays consistent good judgment in the current role of SPI clerk. Seems like a fine candidate for CheckUser. --Orlady (talk) 14:07, 26 September 2011 (UTC)