Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments/CU/Kww
Kww
Oversight candidate pages: Courcelles • Fluffernutter • WilliamH
Comment on the candidate below or by email • Community consultation period is now closed.
Kww (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Nomination statement (250 words max.)
My main adminstrative activity on Wikipedia has always been dealing with sockpuppetry in its various forms. I think anyone reviewing my record WP:SPI will note both my diligence and my accuracy rate. I believe sockpuppetry to be both the most severe and most common form of abuse on Wikipedia. "Severe", because it undermines the basic faith we all need to have that we are actually reaching group consensus, and "common" because I find that in every long term disruption, someone resorts to it in an effort to prevail.
Standard questions for all candidates
Please describe any relevant on-Wiki experience you have for this role.
- A:
Please outline, without breaching your personal privacy, what off-Wiki experience or technical expertise you have for this role.
- A:
Do you hold advanced permissions (checkuser, oversight, bureaucrat, steward) on this or other WMF projects? If so, please list them. Also, do you have OTRS permissions? If so, to which queues?
- A:
Questions for this candidate
Comments
- Comments may also be submitted to the Arbitration Committee privately by emailing arbcom-en-b
lists.wikimedia.org