Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight/2011 CUOS appointments/CU/Keegan
Keegan
Oversight candidate pages: Courcelles • Fluffernutter • WilliamH
Comment on the candidate below or by email • Community consultation period is now closed.
Keegan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Nomination statement (250 words max.)
I would like to continue to serve the English Wikipedia as a CheckUser after the my term on the audit subcommittee expires. My work on Wikipedia always has been and always will be back-end maintenance and accountability- something that CheckUser continues to offer me. I've processed SPI cases with diligence to the substance, circumstance, and policy without issue to accept and process or decline requests. I am knowledgeable of the practice and application of the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy, already serving as an OTRS administrator, English Wikipedia community elected administrator and oversighter, and one of three community selected members of the AUSC. I can be trusted to use the Checkuser tool in a knowledgeable and beneficial way to the English Wikipedia.
Standard questions for all candidates
Please describe any relevant on-Wiki experience you have for this role.
- A:
Please outline, without breaching your personal privacy, what off-Wiki experience or technical expertise you have for this role.
- A:
Do you hold advanced permissions (checkuser, oversight, bureaucrat, steward) on this or other WMF projects? If so, please list them. Also, do you have OTRS permissions? If so, to which queues?
- A:
Questions for this candidate
Comments
- Comments may also be submitted to the Arbitration Committee privately by emailing arbcom-en-b
lists.wikimedia.org