Jump to content

Talk:Fixed-point lemma for normal functions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Arthur Rubin (talk | contribs) at 07:15, 31 August 2011 (Limit Ordinal Definition: WP:BRD). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconMathematics Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Limit Ordinal Definition

Again, by WP:BRD, I'm reverting User:JRSpriggs who seems intent on reverting any of my edits on the topic of limit ordinals. Please discuss the issue here and achieve consensus according to policy prior to reverting my edits again.

My position, as stated on the talk page for Normal function, is that there exist several current texts defining 0 as a limit ordinal. This being the case, a small change in wording which provides a correct definition for either case is, I believe, preferable. TricksterWolf (talk) 03:22, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:BRD, the status of the article before you started editing it should be used until consensus is obtained; i.e., zero is not a limit ordinal. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 07:15, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]