Talk:Overlapping subproblems

Computing Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Some comments on how to solve overlapping subproblems would be great. --Abdull 13:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Dynamic Programming?

A term typically used to describe the feature of problems to which dynamic programming methodology can be applied. It is not likely that this entry could be developed into a decent article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.94.168.176 (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved per discussion. This is a good example of a case where we go contrary to the usual rule and use a plural title. - GTBacchus^(talk) 05:40, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overlapping subproblem → Overlapping subproblems – Here singular is just as meaningless as in "trouser" (Can you clap with one hand?) 71.146.88.109 (talk) 05:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. One of the rare cases where the article title should be a plural, as it is never singular. Jenks24 (talk) 13:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support as the most natural title. I disagree with the stated rational, though. We could say "That is an overlapping subproblem" (cf. "an overlapping tile was stuck against the one I was painting"); but hardly, in standard modern English, "That is a trouser." The article suggests this itself in speaking of a "subproblem" that must, as it turns out, be construed as an overlapping subproblem. Meh. Noetica^Tea? 09:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.