Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amalgam Virgo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sandstein (talk | contribs) at 07:50, 5 August 2011 (Closing debate, result was keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 07:50, 5 August 2011 by Sandstein (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was keep)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. But needs cleanup to remove unsourced conspiracy stuff. Sandstein 07:50, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Amalgam Virgo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I know we cover conspiracy theories but i am not sure this one is sufficient verified and notable to have it's own article. Some more eyes needed. Please discuss. IQinn (talk) 23:24, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merged & Redirect; subject of article appears to be notable within the context of 9/11 conspiracies; therefore any referenced information can be merged and redirected there. --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 09:12, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 20:17, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rewrite perfectly valid article on a U.S. armed forces exercise. Good addition to Category:Military exercises and wargames. Buckshot06 (talk) 00:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the exercise is real and in no way a conspiracy theory.[1] looks like it continues to be held annually too.[2]--Wikireader41 (talk) 02:17, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- in addition multiple cites in Google books if anybody has concerns about notability[3]--Wikireader41 (talk) 15:21, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.