Talk:Dynamic program analysis

This article is not a linkfarm. Before adding products to the list, make sure they are notable by having their own article. If not, try writing the article first.

Computing Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Polyspace

Really doesn't belong on this page. It is a static analysis tool and should be moved to that article.

Redirect

Shouldn't this page just redirect to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performance_analysis ? Or the pages somehow be intertwined? It seems to me the dynamic program analysis article could be replaced completely with the Performance analysis article above. The article should probably be renamed from Performance Analysis to Dynamic binary analysis (that would make more sense to me)

I oppose this merge. Profiling is a sufficiently well-know type of analysis to qualify for a separate article per WP:GNG. Pcap ping 17:20, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Dynamic analysis goes beyond performance analysis. It's a unique topic. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 16:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List criteria

As on other articles, such as List of tools for static code analysis, products being included should be notable, as evidenced by having their own wiki article. Accordingly I will be cleaning up the list for those that don't meet these criteria. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 21:16, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]