Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotlin (programming language)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sandstein (talk | contribs) at 06:45, 3 August 2011 (Closing debate, result was redirect to JetBrains). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 06:45, 3 August 2011 by Sandstein (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was redirect to JetBrains)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to JetBrains. Can be editorially merged from the history as deemed necessary by editors. Sandstein 06:45, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kotlin (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability for this as yet unreleased language. Little mention in any independent reliable sources: apart from the company's own site there are essentially just announcements, which are effectively write-ups of press releases. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:42, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Poor notability indeed. Could be merged into JetBrains, but that article doesn't look very solid either, and seems to be set up mainly with the purpose of introducing its products. Claims to have 200 employees. MakeSense64 (talk) 13:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:24, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect/merge to JetBrains. Doesn't seem notable (yet). Also cleanup several of their other (somewhat spammy) product pages. —Ruud 11:00, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's in development, maybe never released. No different then articles on future events. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 17:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.