This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
I fail to see how Wikipedia benefits from having two articles on Pimsleur. The company only sells one product, so it seems to me that we only really need one page.
Personally, I'm not fussed whether that's this page or Pimsleur language learning system, but I suppose what would make most sense would be to merge the material from that article into this one as the company profile information will be of use to some people.
Prof Wrong (talk) 15:01, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Mods I talked to recommend the company history be a separate page from the theoretical method page. Same as Paul Pimsleur's bio page is separate from the Pimsleur method page. I guess it's similar to how Rosetta Stone wikepdia pages are structured too.