Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boo (programming language)
- Boo (programming language) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Speedy delete clearly a toy project with no notable refences. The only reference is by the developer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs)
- Note - This AFD was malformed. There was no listing in the AFD list for July 26. I have added it. The AFD discussion did not have the standard AFD template material. I have added it in. Note that the nominator is the author of Fly (programming language) which is under consideration for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fly (programming language). -- Whpq (talk) 15:37, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Yup, all programming language entries with no notable references should apparently be removed, so here goes... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs) 16:12, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep If you google, there a many mentions of this language. The problem is simply that the article doesn't reference them. snaphat (talk) 17:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter, since there's not notable reference. Your keep is obviously Keep just because you have issues with me. - FlyLanguage
- It does matter. Simply because the article doesn't reference things, doesn't make the subject not notable, just a poor article. I don't have issue with you, I actually voted weak-delete on another article you nominated for AfD. And, if you'd fix the malformed AFDs for the other stuff you nominated, I would score accordingly (as I agree with you in some of the cases). snaphat (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- It's not notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs) 21:17, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- It does matter. Simply because the article doesn't reference things, doesn't make the subject not notable, just a poor article. I don't have issue with you, I actually voted weak-delete on another article you nominated for AfD. And, if you'd fix the malformed AFDs for the other stuff you nominated, I would score accordingly (as I agree with you in some of the cases). snaphat (talk) 21:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter, since there's not notable reference. Your keep is obviously Keep just because you have issues with me. - FlyLanguage
- Keep Of our multitude of articles on minor and really non-notable languages, Boo is one of the few that does have some notice taken of it outside of its own developers.
- I'd also note the WP:POINTY behaviour of the nominator here, just because their own pet project, Fly, looks likely to not survive an AfD. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not relevant. The Boo article doesn't meet notability requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flylanguage (talk • contribs) 20:48, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 27 July 2011 (UTC)