Contrast variable
![]() | It has been suggested that this article be merged into Contrast (statistics). (Discuss) Proposed since July 2011. |
In statistics, a contrast variable is a linear combination of random variables in which the sum of the coefficients is zero[1]. Each variable may represent random values in one of multiple groups involved in a comparison. Associated with a contrast variable are two terms: the standardized mean of contrast variable (SMCV) and c+-probability. The SMCV is the ratio of mean to standard deviation of a contrast variable and the c+-probability is the probability that a contrast variable obtains a positive value.
Background
Traditional contrast analysis tackles the question of whether a linear combination of group means is exactly zero using significance testing. However, in reality, the key question of interest is usually how far a linear combination of values in multiple groups involved in a comparison is away from zero in a distribution level. [2] Therefore, to effectively compare groups, we need additional analysis to incorporate information in a distribution level. In addition, the value of a traditional contrast has issues in capturing data variability. The p-value from classical t-test of testing a traditional contrast can capture data variability; however, it is affected by both sample size and the strength of a comparison. [3]
To address the issues of traditional contrast analysis, various effect sizes have been proposed. [4] Many of them may fall into two categories: probabilistic indices for comparing groups in a distribution level[5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] and metrics for capturing both mean and variability, which includes various effect sizes similar to standardized mean differences[11] [12] [13] [14]. However, different effect size measures are suitable for different types of data, and the interpretations of effect sizes are generally arbitrary and remain problematic even for the same effect size measure. [15] The contrast variable, along with SMCV and c+-probability, provides potential solutions to these issues.
Concepts
Suppose the random values in t groups represented by random variables have means and variances , respectively. Then a traditional contrast is where 's are a set of coefficients representing a comparison of interest and satisfy . Traditional contrast analysis focuses on testing , or . Correspondingly, a contrast variable is defined as a linear combination of the random variables, i.e., . Thus, the traditional contrast equals the mean of the contrast variable , that is, . The SMCV of contrast variable , denoted by , is defined as[2]
where is the covariance of and . When are independent,
- . The c+-probability is .
Discussions
The c+-probability is a probabilistic index accounting for distributions of compared groups whereas SMCV is an extended variant of standardized mean difference (such as Cohen's [13] and Glass's [14]) incorporating both mean and variance of groups. There is a link between SMCV and c+-probability[1] [2]. Thus, standardized mean difference and probabilistic index are now integrated to effectively assess the strength of a comparison. In addition, the concepts of SMCV and c+-probability are applicable to not only the comparison of two groups but also the comparison of more than two groups. Based on contrast variable, SMCV along with [[c+-probability]] may provide a consistent interpretation to the strength of a comparison.[16] [2] Based on the concept of contrast variable, a traditional contrast (i.e., mean of a contrast variable) and an effect size (i.e., SMCV) are now two characteristics of the same random variable (i.e., a contrast variable); subsequently, they are integrated for any comparison in contrast analysis. [2]
See also
References
- ^ a b Zhang XHD (2009). "A method for effectively comparing gene effects in multiple conditions in RNAi and expression-profiling research". Pharmacogenomics. 10: 345–58. doi:10.2217/14622416.10.3.345.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ a b c d e Zhang XHD (2011). Optimal High-Throughput Screening: Practical Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Genome-scale RNAi Research. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-73444-8.
- ^ Kirk RE (1996). "Practical significance: A concept whose time has come". Educational and Psychological Measurement. 56: 746–59. doi:10.1177/0013164496056005002.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ Huberty CJ (2002). "A history of effect size indices". Educational and Psychological Measurement. 62: 227–40. doi:10.1177/0013164402062002002.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ Owen DB, Graswell KJ, Hanson DL (1964). "Nonparametric upper confidence bounds for P(Y < X) and confidence limits for P(Y<X) when X and Y are normal". Journal of American Statistical Association. 59: 906–24.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Church JD, Harris B (1970). "The estimation of reliability from stress-strength relationships". Technometrics. 12: 49–54.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ Downton F (1973). "The estimation of Pr(Y < X) in normal case". Technometrics. 15: 551–8.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ Reiser B, Guttman I (1986). "Statistical inference for of Pr(Y-less-thaqn-X) - normal case". Technometrics. 28: 253–7.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ Acion L, Peterson JJ, Temple S, Arndt S (2006). "Probabilistic index: an intuitive non-parametric approach to measuring the size of treatment effects". Statistics in Medicine. 25: 591–602. doi:10.1002/sim.2256.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Stine RA, Heyse JF (2001). "Non-parametric estimates of overlap". Statistics in Medicine. 20: 215–36. PMID 11169598.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL, Rubin DB (2000). Contrasts and Effect Sizes in Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-65980-9.
{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Zhang XHD (2007). "A pair of new statistical parameters for quality control in RNA interference high-throughput screening assays". Genomics. 89: 552–61. doi:10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.12.014.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ a b Cohen J (1962). "The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review". Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 65: 145–53. PMID 13880271.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ a b Glass GV (1976). "Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research". Educational Researcher. 5: 3–8. doi:10.3102/0013189X005010003.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ Onwuegbuzie AJ, Levin JR (2003). "Without supporting statistical evidence, where would reported measures of substantive importance lead? To no good effect". Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 65: 133–51.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help) - ^ Zhang XHD (2010). "Contrast variable potentially providing a consistent interpretation to effect sizes". Journal of Biometrics & Biostatistics. 1: 108. doi:10.4172/2155-6180.1000108.
{{cite journal}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter:|month=
(help)CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)