Jump to content

Alternating-direction implicit method

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ben pcc (talk | contribs) at 23:44, 17 July 2011 (Adding a little detail.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

In numerical analysis, the Alternating Direction Implicit (ADI) method is a finite difference method for solving parabolic and elliptic partial differential equations.[1] It is most notably used to solve the problem of heat conduction or solving the diffusion equation in two or more dimensions.

The traditional method for solving the heat conduction equation is the Crank–Nicolson method. This method can be quite costly. The advantage of the ADI method is that the equations that have to be solved in every iteration have a simpler structure and are thus easier to solve.

The method

Consider the linear diffusion equation in two dimensions,

The implicit Crank–Nicolson method produces the following finite difference equation:

where is the central difference operator for the p-coordinate. After performing a stability analysis, it can be shown that this method will be stable for any .

A disadvantage of the Crank–Nicolson method is that the matrix in the above equation is banded with a band width that is generally quite large. This makes direct solution of the system of linear equations quite costly (although efficient approximate solutions exist, for example use of the conjugate gradient method preconditioned with incomplete Cholesky factorization).

The idea behind the ADI method is to split the finite difference equations into two, one with the x-derivative taken implicitly and the next with the y-derivative taken implicitly,

The system of equations involved is symmetric and tridiagonal (banded with bandwidth 3), and is typically solved using tridiagonal matrix algorithm.

It can be shown that this method is unconditionally stable and second order in time and space[2]. There are more refined ADI methods such as the methods of Douglas[3], or the f-factor method[4] which can be used for three or more dimensions.

References

  1. ^ Peaceman, D. W.; Rachford Jr., H. H. (1955), "The numerical solution of parabolic and elliptic differential equations", Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 3 (1): 28–41, doi:10.1137/0103003, MR0071874.
  2. ^ Douglas, Jr., J. (1955), "On the numerical integration of uxx+ uyy= utt by implicit methods", Journal of the Society of Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 3: 42–65, MR0071875.
  3. ^ Douglas Jr., Jim (1962), "Alternating direction methods for three space variables", Numerische Mathematik, 4 (1): 41–63, doi:10.1007/BF01386295, ISSN 0029-599X.
  4. ^ Chang, M. J.; Chow, L. C.; Chang, W. S. (1991), "Improved alternating-direction implicit method for solving transient three-dimensional heat diffusion problems", Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 19 (1): 69–84, doi:10.1080/10407799108944957, ISSN 1040-7790.