Talk:Connected-component labeling
| Robotics Mid‑importance | |||||||
| |||||||
I intend to clean up this article and list a few of the common algorithms (2-pass rasterization for example). Charlie.liban (talk) 18:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Done, and I completely forgot to add a description to the revision. Charlie.liban (talk) 05:13, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
- Added an image for clarification. Charlie.liban (talk) 05:58, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
is the link to a spanish blog post really appropriate in the english article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.6.202.194 (talk) 15:41, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think so. Removed. --Prydeson (talk) 21:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
Is it worth adding text about doing connected component labeling in a distributed parallel setting? There are significant scientific challenges to do doing this. SeanAhern (talk) 14:23, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
I would like to see a generalized algorithm for 3 or more dimensional labeling tinku99 —Preceding undated comment added 03:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC).
- I'll look into it. Voxel CCL is of interest to biomedical imaging, so you may find some information in papers related to that. -charlie liban (talk) 17:06, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
It is quite hard to understand the pseudo code 'linked[label] = union(linked[label], L).. maby some explanations —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.27.187.36 (talk) 12:56, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
- The whole article is looking a bit cluttered for such a simple concept. I'll try and clarify this with better pseudocode. -charlie liban (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
What language is the second source code in? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.192.203.26 (talk) 04:57, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
- MATLAB from the looks of it -charlie liban (talk) 21:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)
Maybe this algorithm should also be mentioned, it uses an entirely different approach, in one sequential scan all components are listed: http://telin.ugent.be/~jdebock/#cc