Jump to content

Talk:Technical Specifications for Interoperability

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rich Farmbrough (talk | contribs) at 18:58, 12 July 2011 (Subst "Unsigned IP" and minor fixes using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconTrains Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

TSIs are not in any sense the property of ERA, therefore ERA should not be used preceding the term. ERA is mandated to draft TSIs, so ERA only prepares proposals. The TSIs are in fact decisions from the Commission. These decisions are taken after consultation of the representatives of Member States in the so called RIS Committee. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.206.65.68 (talk)

There are lots of technical specifications, and lots of them are for interoperability. We need the prefix not to specify ownership, but to distinguish it by its area of application. The reference page has ERA's logo on the top of the page. --Alvestrand (talk) 17:01, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]