Talk:Nearest integer function
![]() | Mathematics Redirect‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
|
{{talkheader} I'm not sure I agree with the idea that we always round to an even number. I think it is more common, natural and useful to round up in the event of a half-integer. 137.205.139.149 22:46, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Notation
I see that the MathWorld site uses [x] but this is quite unusual: [x] has more often been used for integer part in the past. One notation that I have seen often is , although for some reason I find this faintly disturbing. More old-fashioned is . I'll find some references. Richard Pinch (talk) 19:05, 16 August 2008 (UTC)
Graph
The graph shown is a bit confusing, in that the point on the x-axis crossed by the y-axis is -0.5 rather than 0, and there are no other x-axis labels. It's hard to see the primary difference from the floor function, this way. --67.242.12.135 (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
- The image is quite terrible. I'm removing it. -71.195.18.33 (talk) 18:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
Nearest even integer?
I've never seen the convention that the round function rounds to the nearest even integer -- is there any citation for this being "usual"? --Joel B. Lewis (talk) 00:55, 3 July 2011 (UTC)