Talk:I'm with Cupid/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7^(Talk) 23:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one on. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 23:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria 1a (Prose clear, spelling correct) and 1b (lead, layout, W2W, fiction, list stuff)

Lead

Valentine's day (capitalize Day)
"Apu gives his wife "--> gives to his wife?
"Apu, in order to sabotage" - Remove ", in order"
"would air on" --> was to air on
"to be relate to" --> to relate to
The lead should also discuss stuff from the Cultural references section.

Production

"Valentine's day" - capitalize Day
The article says that the episode was created because it aired on Valentine's Day. I'm not quite sure what that means.
Are you able to specify which the TV series that had an episode that conflicted with this episode's name?
"He does not believe that copyright issues will arise though:" --> However, he did not believe that copyright issues would arise:

Reception

The reviews are probably better described as generally positive. Not all the included reviews approved of the episode.

Criterion 2a (All stuff cited, separate ref section)

The Plath ref should link to page 2.

Criterion 2b (Argue-able stuff is cited)

In the lead, cite the 7.7 million/48th place tidbit.

Criterion 2c (WP:NOR)

All clear here.

Criterion 3b (all main topics covered)

Checks out.

Criterion 3c (doesn't go into unnecessary detail)

Looks alright.

Criterion 4 (no undue weight)

This one's good.

Criterion 5 (stable)

Tis stable indeed.

Criterion 6a (images properly documented)

The Elton John photo checks out.

Criterion 6b (captions and images relevant)

The Elton John photo checks out in both cases.

Overall comments

Excellent work. This is already a high quality article, and after the tweaks, should be all set for GA. Good work, Queenieacoustic! This was actually quite an interesting read to me. :) --Starstriker7^(Talk) 01:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]