Talk:I'm with Cupid/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7^(Talk) 23:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

I'll take this one on. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 23:57, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Criteria 1a (Prose clear, spelling correct) and 1b (lead, layout, W2W, fiction, list stuff)

Lead

• Valentine's day (capitalize Day)
• "Apu gives his wife "--> gives to his wife?
• "Apu, in order to sabotage" - Remove ", in order"
• "would air on" --> was to air on
• "to be relate to" --> to relate to
• The lead should also discuss stuff from the Cultural references section.

Production

• "Valentine's day" - capitalize Day
• The article says that the episode was created because it aired on Valentine's Day. I'm not quite sure what that means.
• Are you able to specify which the TV series that had an episode that conflicted with this episode's name?
• "He does not believe that copyright issues will arise though:" --> However, he did not believe that copyright issues would arise:

Reception

• The reviews are probably better described as generally positive. Not all the included reviews approved of the episode.

Criterion 2a (All stuff cited, separate ref section)

• The Plath ref should link to page 2.

Criterion 2b (Argue-able stuff is cited)

• In the lead, cite the 7.7 million/48th place tidbit.

Criterion 2c (WP:NOR)

All clear here.