Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Perl Programming

Advanced Perl Programming

Advanced Perl Programming (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be an average programming book. No indication of what makes it notable. FuFoFuEd (talk) 00:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

• Delete. No independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Wikipedia is not a catalog WP:NOTCATALOG. Msnicki (talk) 00:23, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

• Keep Cited in 7 other books. The (non)-existence of some independent book reviews from reliable sources could still sway my vote either way. As the nominator has not bothered to look for those I'll go with keep for now. —Ruud 10:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
  • If we kept every computer science publication that had 7 citations we'd have a ridiculous amount of barely notable material here. You have just voted to delete some with 16 citations at Natural Constraint Language. FuFoFuEd (talk) 11:41, 20 June 2011 (UTC)