Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Non-autoconfirmed posts
If you are blocked | If you cannot post to a noticeboard because you are a new editor, post to this page |
---|---|
|
|
See also |
---|
Hi there,
I took note of these rules but let me say something.On wikipedia except classical composers who really are sacred monsters of incontestable value(J.S.Bach,Mozart,Beethoven,Mussorgsky,Tchaikovsky,Vivaldi,Rossini,Chopin,R.Strauss)to name just a very few of them and which the world has forgotten them totally and also except american jazz musicians who really are vallue,the rest,most of them who appear on Wikipedia are just normal and bellow the value level.They can prove with tons of papers and cd´s,concerts,mtv´s videos without any value,that they have references,and that can earn millions dollars.One thing can´t they prove:THE REAL VALUE and TALENT that is NONEXISTENT.I know many such persons.All they´ve put on wikipedia is just lies.Except the papers, these people can´t never,ever prove theirs TALENT or if they are suitable for this profession called MUSICIAN,profession that today is rolling in the mud by anyone.
I am from a family of musicians(the real ones),I studied classicaly violin,music theory,harmony and composition(on real),can always prove it,I played all my life only in professional context(studio recording,live concerts,only with best musicians,as jazz instrumentist and many times as classicaly violinist in symphony orchestras).I am also high class arranger - pop,classicaly,jazz).But in Wikipedia´s opinion such musicians do not deserve to be on files.
I don´t mind att all,but I wanted to get aware my opinion about all this shit and don´t forget:I will remain the same professional musician who love and respect my job and who never failed to prostitute for money´s sake.
Thank you for you took your time to read my lines.
M.Ilie
--Prodipe (talk) 15:39, 17 June 2011 (UTC)