Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hadith of Umar and foretelling

Hadith of Umar and foretelling

Delete and/or Merge to Umar an unverifiable page (only one questionable source used), possible fork. Created by User:Striver. Jersey Devil 01:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/Delete as per User:Jersey Devil -- Oarias 03:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep nominator afd's since i created it, he does not know anything about the article, or even hadith knowledge. He claims the sources is questionable . THe source is Sahih Bukhari [1], the number one most trusted book in Sunni Islam. No much different than saying the bible is a questionable source. User:Jersey Devil has a problem with me personaly and is consuming wikipedia time in the proces, that is all. I suggest he does that witout claming Sahih Bukhari is "questionable" sources.--Striver 12:08, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Merge/~~delete. Lacks context; context is provided in parent articles, no point in adding context thereby creating copy of other articles. A maze of zillions of context-free article about religious trivia is an unhelpful way to inform a reader. Weregerbil 12:28, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I added conext, but it needs grammar fix and sourcing.--Striver 13:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also, see Matthew 1:5 for a example of how a single bible verse can contitute a entire article.--Striver 13:06, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Changed from "Merge/delete" to "delete" as the whole group of articles keeps getting more and more about "Shia view" trashing the "Sunni view" soapboxing. Weregerbil 13:48, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, you do agree that the topic is both verified and notable? In fact, so much that it is used in the Sunni/Shia arguments? If you came to that conclusion, why are you voting delete? If the article is pov, it needs npoving, not deleting, and i need assistance with the article, i cant to perfect articles on my own. --Striver 14:21, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]