Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xavier Protocols

Xavier Protocols

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. There appear to be no reliable sources that cover this fictional concept. It has no real-world significance and can only be written about from an in-universe perspective. Suitable for an X-Men wiki but not for Wikipedia. Harley Hudson (talk) 19:44, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why it "can only be written about from an in-universe perspective." Am I missing something that prevents a rewrite from fixing that? Cloveapple (talk) 18:13, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It can only be written about from an in-universe perspective because there are no sources that support writing anything about it from a real-world perspective. Harley Hudson (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Professor X, as he's the guy who wrote them. Mathewignash (talk) 03:13, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Professor X. Kurt Parker (talk) 13:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Professor X.--Crazy runner (talk) 15:23, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I was under the impression that content had to be sourced to be merged. Harley Hudson (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Content ought to be sourced in all cases, regardless, but that doesn't mean it can't be sourced before or after the merge. BOZ (talk) 16:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above. BOZ (talk) 16:48, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In-universe guff with no relevance outside of the primary material. --Cameron Scott (talk) 20:24, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]