This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This article appears to lack any reliable independent secondary sources as required by WP:GNG, WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:RELIABLE. I hatted it but the hat was removed by Qwertyus, citing "Van Rossum, Ewing and scikits-learn; also 2-column reflist" in his edit summary. But the Van Rossum and and Ewing articles are merely posts to a mailing list and scikit-learn isn't even a source, it's another machine-learning tool for Python. That's nowhere near satisfying the requirements in WP:RELIABLE that the sources be "reliable, published sources" (emphasis in the original) and that "Articles should be based on reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."Msnicki (talk) 19:21, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a reason to remove the article, it's a reason to improve the sources. I've replaced {{notability}} with {{primary sources}}. If you do want to argue importance, it's a well-established project used by thousands of programmers. ··gracefool☺13:16, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
