Jump to content

Talk:Minimum Foundation Program/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Talk:Minimum Foundation Program
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Guerillero (talk | contribs) at 02:50, 6 May 2011 (→GA Review: update). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Guerillero | My Talk 03:37, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Since no one has jumped on this yet I will do the review. --Guerillero | My Talk 03:37, 30 April 2011 (U


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  • The use of abbreviations
  • Currently, there is a one sentence paragraph. It needs to be integrated into another paragraph or be expanded.
 Done
  • The word however is used to connect two sentences. (For example: We went to the park; however, it rained.)
  • Please watch weasel words.
    • However, many use the term "MFP" to refer specifically to the portion the state pays per student to each school district
 Done
  • There are several fragments that need to be full sentences.
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  • The lead needs to summarize the whole article not just introduce it.
 Done
  • The hyphens(-) should be dashes. (I will do this with AWB)
 Done
  • References should come directly after a full stop (.).
 Done
2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  • Reference 1 should use page numbers.
  • Reference 8
    • should link to the specific report used not just the directory.
    • should also use page numbers.
  • There should be references after each point on the numbered list not before it
 Done
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). see above
2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. One author
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. Could any files be implemented?
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
7. Overall assessment. You have 10 days to work on this. Best of luck. --Guerillero | My Talk 04:15, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Minimum_Foundation_Program/GA1&oldid=427689331"