Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dash Express
- Dash Express (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
notibility? no good coverage as the software/project is now defunct. Alan - talk 00:04, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Defunct is meaningless as notability is not temporary. I feel that sourcing on the article itself is sufficient, but others may want to do a quick look through a periodicals database to confirm sourcing. riffic (talk) 03:01, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Holy cow? There are so many coverage in reliable source, and you call it non-notable? --Reference Desker (talk) 06:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - although a defunct software which abandoned its GPS devices, sufficient references exist for notability as part of the history of GPS and software for GPS devices. --Whiteguru (talk) 09:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)