User talk:Paxcoder
Free sofware vs. Open source
Thanks for pointing this out. Please see my comment on this. Thank you.--torusJKL (talk) 13:05, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
Free software
Hi... Why the image is a pointless image man?... is related to free and open sources licences, and the relation to all who interact for make software... really I made a mistake when you add it first ... so I removed that from that place ... Thank you for sending this message ... maybe you can tell me any image related to this, after that I design, and places it in the right place...
V A R G U X write me a comment 05:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment again... Well, I drew this picture ... perhaps, as you mention, I should add arrow and some description, with a caption below.
- I will create a new version, adding what you mention and some things that are useful and which are related to FOSS.
- V A R G U X
write me a comment 02:28, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Gnewsense
Hi Paxcoder, i dont understand it, on 4 October you add GNU/Linux to the article [[2]] with a comment, and today the reverse, whats up ? also there is no user Paxcoder who joined Talk:GNewSense. So feel free to do so now Mion (talk) 16:55, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- no appologies needed, solved. Cheers Mion (talk) 21:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
About my quote on St. Ignatius
Thanks for not removing the quote Paxcoder. I understand all that stuff about importance when adding citations, but to be honest, what is more important than Ignatius' quotes about Jesus? I mean, people who go to St. Ignatius' page are almost certainly going because of their curiosity of his relation to Jesus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Glorthac (talk • contribs) 03:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
La Salette comments
You suggested removal in 2008: I second that, having added some chapter and verse on why on the discussion page, as this is a gross breach of NPOV written by a Catholic adorative. Please contact me on jelmain skynet be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.129.142.15 (talk) 00:45, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
I suggested a removal of the reference of it being confirmed only. As I can see, this has since been provided sources for. --Paxcoder (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
ANI thread
Hello, you have been reported on WP:ANI [3]. Regards, --DIREKTOR (TALK) 13:10, 6 July 2010 (UTC)