Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nkx2-2as

Nkx2-2as

Nkx2-2as (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Delete This pages is not notable. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
• Keep The source is from a peer reviewed article in a respected journal. The gene is conserved, therefore evolution knows it's notable. It's just taking scientific researchers a little longer to figure this out. --Paul (talk) 12:05, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

• Delete. Not every peer reviewed paper deserves its own Wikipedia article. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC).
  • Comment: Agreed. But this doesn't exclude the fact that some papers do. I would argue that each species and gene is notable enough to deserve an article. Eventually there will be multiple sources for each. Science is just a little slow. BTW, I've added some more refs to the article, will add more content in time. --Paul (talk) 08:00, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
• Keep Subject of multiple peer reviewed article, function has been determined. Boghog (talk) 09:10, 26 March 2011 (UTC)