Talk:Lattice-based cryptography

Cryptography: Computer science Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Merge Lattice problems into this article

I propose merger of the Lattice problems article into this one. IMHO, the Lattice problems article, in its current state, does not warrant a separate page. Also, eventually, many of the problems mentioned will have a separate page of their own, and hence, the article will end up being a short condensed summary of each problem, the number of which is not too many. Hrushikesh Tilak (talk) 21:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Merging is a good idea. --Robin (talk) 17:35, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. They really should be merged. Search engines point to this page on some searches and to Lattice Based Cryptography page on others (related searches). I second your thoughts on this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Akashssp (talk • contribs) 16:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreed. This article is about a hard problem in computer science. Many such problems may have applications in cryptography, however that is not their primary function. They are surely separate articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.82.39.139 (talk) 14:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreed. Ditto the above comments. Theoretical computer science has a separate existenceoutside of the world of cryptography. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.82.39.139 (talk) 14:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.100.220.139 (talk) [reply]