Talk:Unicode equivalence

Typography C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Computing C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The tone of this article is really technical. babbage (talk) 04:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is it OK to add a link to some software that I found it useful? It's called charlint and its a perl script that can be used for normalisation. It can be found at http://www.w3.org/International/charlint/ Wrecktaste (talk) 15:54, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

Glyph Composition / Decomposition redirects here, but the term glyph is not used in this article. — Christoph Päper 15:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subset

Mathematically speaking, the compatible forms are subsets of the canonical ones. But that sentence is a bit confusing and should probably be rewritten. 213.100.90.101 (talk) 16:36, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Then please do so. I prefer a readable Unicode description. -DePiep (talk) 22:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]