Talk:Weak-field approximation
This talk page may meet Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion as a dependent page of a page which has never existed or has been deleted. This does not include pages which are useful to the project such as user subpages and talk pages, talk page archives, information for a future article, redirects that can be retargeted to existing pages, etc. See CSD G8. Weak-field approximation was deleted and redirected to Linearized gravity, but Talk:Weak-field approximation was left in place with no pages linking to it.
If this talk page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please remove this notice. Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. This page was last edited by Guy Macon (contribs | logs) at 22:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC) (14 years ago) |
![]() | Physics Redirect‑class | ||||||
|
Far-field versus Weak-field
Actually, far-field theory treats gravitation far from massive objects. In such regions, the field is indeed weak, but weak-field theory is more general. In particular, it also treats the production of gravitational radiation by say a binary star system.
The rest of the current article actually discusses the Newtonian limit, another special case of weak-field theory, where we also assume that test particles are moving slowly with respect to the speed of light.
I propose to rewrite the article to clarify these points. CH
Hi Hillman. As you can tell, my knowledge of this area is pretty dire. In the rewrite, can you at least keep the chunk of text and equations already present - maybe put them in another article ('Newtonian limit' perhaps) if that's better - as I spent a bit of time working through the equations to check they were correct. --- Mpatel 10:03, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Merger
The proposed merger should be done by expert as part of program of greatly improving articles on weak-field theory, which will require writing many new articles as well as merging the two existing ones. See the todo list at the top of Talk:Linearized gravity. ---CH 00:46, 6 February 2006 (UTC)