Tree-walking automaton
A tree walking automaton (TWA) is a type of finite automaton that deals with tree structures rather than strings.
The following article deals with tree walking automata. For a different notion of tree automaton, closely related to regular tree languages, see branching automaton.
Definition
All trees are assumed to be binary, with labels from a fixed alphabet .
Informally, a tree walking automaton A (TWA) is a finite state device which walks over the tree in a sequential manner. At each moment A visits node v in state q. Depending on the state q, the label of the node v, and whether the node is the root, a left child, a right child or a leaf, A changes its state from q to q' and moves to the parent of v or its left or right child. A TWA accepts a tree if it enters an accepting state, and rejects if its enters a rejecting state or makes an infinite loop. As with string automata, a TWA may be deterministic or nondeterministic.
More formally, a (nondeterministic) tree walking automaton over alphabet is a tuple:
where is a finite set of states, are the sets of respectively initial, accepting and rejecting states, and is the transition relation: .
Example
A simple example of a tree walking automaton is a TWA that performs depth-first search (DFS) on the input tree. The automaton has 3 states, . begins in the root in state and descends to the left subtree. Then it processes the tree recursively. Whenever enters a node in state , it means that the left subtree of has just been processed, so it proceeds to the right subtree of . If enters a node in state , it means that the whole subtree with root has been processed and walks to the parent of and changes its state to or , depending on whether is a left or right child.
The resulting automaton is the following: File:Twa-dfs.png
Properties
Unlike branching automata, tree walking automata are difficult to analyze and even simple properties are nontrivial to prove. The following list summarizes some known facts related to TWA:
- As shown by Bojanczyk & Colcombet (2006) , deterministic TWA are strictly weaker than nondeterministic ones ()
- deterministic TWA are closed under complementation (but it is not known whether the same holds for nondeterministic ones)
- the set of languages recognized by TWA is strictly contained in regular tree languages (), i.e. there exist regular languages which are not recognized by any tree walking automaton (Bojanczyk & Colcombet 2008) .
See also
- Pebble automata, an extension of tree walking automata
References
- Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2005.10.031, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1016/j.tcs.2005.10.031
instead. - Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1137/050645427, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with
|doi=10.1137/050645427
instead.
External links
- Mikołaj Bojanczyk: Tree-walking automata. A brief survey.