Jump to content

Talk:Formulario mathematico

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rgdboer (talk | contribs) at 20:04, 5 March 2011 (rate C). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconBooks C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

oral tradition?

The comment on Peano's pedagogical failure is an interesting one. I am not sure the link to oral tradition is the right one, though. Some how this should connect with "didactic transformation" or "didactic transposition". Tkuvho (talk) 05:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you noticed the same image used on both lecture and mathematics education. The classroom offerings of teachers continue to be mainstream education.Rgdboer (talk) 01:21, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
But Peano also used to give oral classroom presentations. The question is not whether or not to teach orally, but how to teach orally. It seems to me that Peano thought that the foundations of mathematics are also the foundations of a young person's learning. The same thinking was at the bottom of the new math. The pedagogical failure of both shows the two foundations are not the same. Didactic transformation is the recognition that mathematics as seen by researchers needs to be transformed before it can be taught effectively in such a way as to relate to the students' intuition and background. Tkuvho (talk) 03:17, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]