This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.
Article titles are singular
I just corrected this one a few days ago. Why de-correct it? If there is a redirect to the wrong name, I missed it and will correct it. Is there some exception to the singular-as-title rule?Shajure (talk) 02:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is gone. The examples given in the article are all examples of vulnerabilities that may lead to exploits; they are not themselves exploits. The term "string exploit" is, moreover, not found as a term of art in the literature. --Lambiam00:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Improper input validation can occur within a program built by the programmer that will only be used by the programmer. Therefore, the term does not, as the article says now, define a "vulnerability", since such depends on context. I'm not saying I've studied this issue, but where this has gone isn't making sense. An Asciiz exploit is not something that may "lead" to an exploit, it is an exploit, for example. Unscintillating (talk) 02:42, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
There just isn't enough here for an article. The name doesn't matter, really, the value here is in making sure that the readers can find what they are seeking.Shajure (talk) 06:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
