Talk:Improper input validation

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 February 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security

???

This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:

Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Article titles are singular

~~I just corrected this one a few days ago. Why de-correct it? If there is a redirect to the wrong name, I missed it and will correct it. Is there some exception to the singular-as-title rule?~~Shajure (talk) 02:08, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Database server lag... the rename / redirect was... odd. Pay no mind.Shajure (talk) 02:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to the word "exploit" in the title

Unscintillating (talk) 20:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is gone. The examples given in the article are all examples of vulnerabilities that may lead to exploits; they are not themselves exploits. The term "string exploit" is, moreover, not found as a term of art in the literature. --Lambiam 00:10, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]