Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Join Java

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested with no reason given. No outside verifiable significant coverage to establish notability. Yaksar (let's chat) 21:47, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For the purposes of transparency, I should probably point out that for the same reasons I nominated

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- Cybercobra (talk) 03:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are 4 journal articles about it listed in the article's References. The third-party peer review involved in getting a journal article accepted+published makes these sufficiently independent for notability purposes, at least in my view. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There area also a number of derivative works referencing this work in google scholar. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.34.160 (talk) 12:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]
Keep as above. —Ruud 21:34, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I want to say I have no real desire to have this article deleted. However, I need to point out that, given that the four references in the article are all written by it's creator, you're going to actually need to refer to at least one other source that can be considered reliable.--Yaksar (let's chat) 08:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]