Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joy (programming language) (2nd nomination)

Joy (programming language)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested with zero reason given (I'm sensing a trend here). No notability established from outside verifiable and substantial coverage. Yaksar (let's chat) 21:43, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Vector journal article, ACM SIGPLAN Notices article, EuroForth conference paper. All of which were presented at the previous AfD; I agree with User:Cyclopia's comment from that AfD. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:57, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
WP:Buro Renomination churning of a recent AfD that resulted in SpeedyKeep with six keep !votes and a withdrawal. See also WP:N#cite_note-7. Unscintillating (talk) 07:56, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be intentionally ignorant please. You and I both know that the other AfDs were biased from outside canvassing, and that the nominator withdrew his nomination and left wikipedia as a result of that.--Yaksar (let's chat) 07:59, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(ec)Don't know and don't want to know, if that is why we are here, then I recommend that you withdraw any such WP:POINT nominations and allow some time to pass. Thanks, Unscintillating (talk) 08:36, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's 0 POINTyness involved here, as explained before.--Yaksar (let's chat) 08:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(ec)*Comment As per my Keep !vote in the previous AfD, this language is also supported by references at Cat. Unscintillating (talk) 08:50, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]