Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SBC Architecture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) at 01:48, 21 February 2011 (Closing debate, result was delete without prejudice). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 01:48, 21 February 2011 by Ron Ritzman (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete without prejudice)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete without prejudice. If anybody has a sound "keep" argument I'll be glad to restore this article and reopen the AFD. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- SBC Architecture (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Only source is a book published by the dubious Lambert Academic Publishing, apparently by the same author who created this article. —Ruud 14:23, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. First, I did some more extensive searching and couldn't find any independent reliable source on this subject. Several kinds of "SBC Architecture" are mentioned, but none about the SBC Systems architecture. Second: The article claims "SBC architecture was created during the late-1980s by Dr. William S. Chao". I cannot find any proof of that on the web. -- Mdd (talk) 22:15, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:46, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There has been some more discussion about this subject here. To me this is an other prove that there is little to none international (I mean English) reliable sources about this subject. -- Mdd (talk) 01:09, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.