Talk:JSON-RPC

Computing Stub‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Example

As someone has pointed out, the example for JSON-RPC is outdated. I don't know exactly what has changed with JSON-RPC, but I think it would be more reader-friendly if someone with a bit more experience with JSON-RPC would correct it. Quartz (talk) 23:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Updated examples

I have added examples for the current release (1.0) and for the proposed specification (2.0).
If anyone has the time for it, the bullet list under "Implementations" could be made into a nice table and extended with more implementations (there is a richer list on the official JSON-RPC homepage). --Clausc (talk) 15:48, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WDSL equivalent: SMD?

What is the WSDL equivalent for JSON-RPC?

There is something called SMD, which means - depending on which source you consult - "Simple Method Description" (http://groups.google.com/group/json-rpc/web/simple-method-description-for-json-rpc-example) or "Service Mapping Description" (http://groups.google.com/group/json-schema/web/service-mapping-description-proposal) but the sources disagree on the syntax. --AndreKR (talk) 23:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Someone could write a few more descriptive sentences to each version. Currently it's too short to be useful. thanks. --188.99.245.106 (talk) 14:40, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]