Jump to content

Talk:Structured systems analysis and design method

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Martinvl (talk | contribs) at 11:51, 15 February 2011 (Rollback of 15-February 2011.: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Third paragraph, what's an 'IS'?

"SSADM is a waterfall method by which an IS design can be arrived at ..."

An IS is an Information System...

I just expanded this acronym for non-experts and linked to Wikipedia article. 80.195.186.192 15:21, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Constantine and DFDs

It surprised me to see Larry Constantine listed as "inventor" of dataflow diagrams. Is there any documentation for this claim? DFDs have been around for a long time. —rodii 15:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to go really far back, we used flow diagrams involving decks of cards back in 1959 (when I got into the business), and probably several years earlier, but we didn't have the acronym DFD then... Jpaulm 20:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why all the black in the Introduction?

Why all the black type in the Introduction? I confess I find it hard to read. Jpaulm 23:31, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rename?

Shouldn't this be Structured Systems Analysis and Design Methodology? That is what is was called when I studied it, never method. Greenwood (talk) 01:36, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback of 15-February 2011.

I could see no reason for the removal of the section on the history of SSADM so I reverted it. If you feel that the section is not relevant to the artle, please seek consensus. I for one believe that the history has a place in the article. Martinvl (talk) 11:51, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]