Talk:Double recursion
Appearance
![]() | Mathematics Stub‑class Low‑priority | |||||||||
|
Oooh, this is a badly written article. It's simple, there are two iterators, but not yet an Ackermann function. I mean this double recursion still defines a primitive recursive function! I suppose we just have to follow the definition of Rozsa Peter and not much additional speculative talk. But it takes an overhaul of the page and for me if I'd do it the moderators would undo this again so I won't. Credentials eh? --Gerard van Novaloka (talk) 21:19, 12 February 2011 (UTC)