Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Foundation for Enterprise Development
- Foundation for Enterprise Development (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article seems to be mainly just a way to advertise a non-notable foundation. Also, the creator (User:Bizzwriter) has a COI given his profession, which can be seen at his LinkedIn account. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:18, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
- I am also nominating the following related pages because of advertising and COI:
- SPORTS for Exceptional Athletes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) Jrcla2 (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
I disagree with this assessment of both of these articles. First of all, yes, I have/do work with both organizations, but I work with many organizations as business writer. Does that mean that I cannot write about ANY organization that I have worked with or that I have interviewed someone at? The reason I created articles on both of these nonprofits is that I believe that they rise to the level of notability. If someone does a google search for either organization, I believe they should be able to find out about them in an unbiased way on wikipedia. What measure exactly do you apply to define a "notable" nonprofit? Please explain so I can understand what makes these two non-notable. Thank you. bizzwriter